As businesses face constant change and increasing complexity, they need teams that are adaptable, collaborative, and capable of bridging gaps between fields. The traditional model of hiring specialists who work in silos is no longer enough—organizations now require talent that can think broadly while maintaining deep expertise in critical areas. This shift has led to the rise of T-shaped, N-shaped, and M-shaped teams, each representing different approaches to skill distribution and collaboration.
Understanding these models is essential for recruiting and building a workforce that can innovate, pivot quickly, and drive long-term success.
In this article, we’ll explore what these team structures mean, how they differ, and why the right mix of these profiles can give your business a competitive edge.
Table of contents
Understanding T-Shaped Teams
The concept of T-shaped skills has gained significant traction recently, particularly in the technology industry. The “T” shape symbolizes a balance between depth and breadth of knowledge:
- The vertical bar represents deep expertise in a single discipline—whether that’s software engineering, data analysis, marketing, or another core function.
- The horizontal bar signifies a broad understanding of related fields and the ability to collaborate across teams.
Why T-Shaped Teams Are Valuable
T-shaped professionals excel in environments where agility and cross-functional collaboration are key. Unlike pure specialists (who may struggle outside their niche) or generalists (who lack deep expertise), T-shaped employees bring the best of both worlds.
For example, consider a product manager who specializes in user research (vertical expertise) but also understands UX design, basic coding, and business strategy (horizontal knowledge). This allows them to communicate effectively with engineers, designers, and executives—speeding up decision-making and reducing friction in development cycles.
Companies that cultivate T-shaped teams often see:
- Faster problem-solving: Employees can contribute beyond their primary role, reducing bottlenecks.
- Stronger innovation: Cross-disciplinary knowledge sparks creative solutions.
- Better adaptability: When priorities shift, T-shaped employees can adjust more smoothly.
However, as businesses grow more complex, some organizations require talent with many deep skill sets—leading to the emergence of N-shaped and M-shaped teams.
Beyond the T: The Rise of N-Shaped and M-Shaped Teams Professionals
While the T-shaped model remains relevant, some organizations are finding they need even greater versatility from their talent. This has led to the emergence of N-shaped and M-shaped professionals—individuals who combine multiple areas of deep expertise with broad collaborative skills.
- N-shaped professionals take the concept one step further by developing two vertical bars of specialization instead of one. Imagine a data professional who has deep expertise in both machine learning and data engineering. This dual specialization allows them to bridge what are often separate domains in many organizations.
- M-shaped professionals represent the next evolution, with three or more areas of deep expertise. These rare individuals often emerge as natural leaders in complex technical environments. A typical M-shaped professional in the tech industry might combine expertise in software architecture, cloud computing, and security with strong leadership skills. They can see connections between domains that others might miss and are particularly valuable in strategic roles where understanding trade-offs between different technical constraints is crucial.
What distinguishes these models from simply being “multi-specialists” is the intentional development of both depth and the connective tissue between specialties. An M-shaped engineer isn’t just someone who knows a little about several technologies—they have genuine, substantive expertise in multiple areas and the ability to synthesize across them.
This makes them particularly effective at solving complex, multidimensional problems that would require multiple specialists working separately in more traditional models.
Strategic Implications for Team Composition
Understanding these models is only the first step. The real challenge—and opportunity—lies in deliberately composing teams with the right mix of these profiles based on an organization’s specific needs and stage of growth.
- Early-stage startups and innovation teams often benefit most from M-shaped and N-shaped profiles. In these environments, resources are limited, roles are fluid, and the ability to wear multiple hats is invaluable. A founding team member who can handle full-stack development, cloud infrastructure, and even some product management can accelerate progress dramatically in the early days.
- As organizations scale, the balance typically shifts toward more T-shaped professionals forming the core of teams, with N-shaped individuals in key bridging roles and specialists brought in for particularly complex or niche requirements.
- Large enterprises might have all three profiles distributed strategically—M-shaped leaders setting technical vision, N-shaped professionals ensuring integration between domains, and T-shaped team members executing with both depth and collaboration.
The key is recognizing that these models aren’t about labeling people but about intentionally developing and deploying skills across an organization.
Many companies make the mistake of assuming these profiles emerge naturally, when in reality they require deliberate cultivation through hiring practices, career development paths, and organizational design.
Developing a Future-Ready Workforce
Building teams with these skill profiles requires action on multiple fronts—from hiring to learning and development to organizational structure.
On the hiring front, it means looking beyond traditional credentialing and résumé keywords to identify candidates who demonstrate both depth and breadth. Technical assessments need to evaluate core skills and the ability to apply them in cross-disciplinary contexts.
Behavioral interviews should probe for examples of collaboration across domains and adaptability to new challenges.
Learning and development programs must move beyond narrow skill training to create opportunities for broadening experiences. This might include rotation programs that expose engineers to product management or designers to user research.
It certainly requires creating time and space for continuous learning in a world where technical skills have increasingly short half-lives.
Perhaps most importantly, organizational structures and incentives need to support these models. Traditional promotion ladders that reward ever-narrower specialization can work against developing T-shaped and N-shaped professionals.
Performance metrics that only measure individual contributions without accounting for cross-functional impact can discourage the very collaboration these models depend on.
The Path Forward
As we look to the future of work, one thing is clear: the complexity of business challenges will only increase, and the ability to navigate that entanglement will separate thriving organizations from those that struggle. The transition won’t always be easy—it requires rethinking hiring practices, career paths, and even how we measure success.
But for companies willing to make the investment, the payoff is a workforce that’s not just skilled but future-ready. The models of T-shaped, N-shaped, and M-shaped teams provide a framework for building that capability. For organizations looking to accelerate this transition, specialized partners like Techunting can provide valuable expertise in identifying and attracting professionals who embody these multidimensional skill sets.
