Pact testing is a popular contract testing framework that ensures seamless interactions between microservices. It allows teams to verify that the consumer and provider services communicate as expected, preventing integration failures when services evolve. In this post, we’ll walk through a real Pact testing example in practice, demonstrating how this framework can be used to test interactions between services and ensure their compatibility.
Introduction to Pact Testing
Pact testing focuses on validating the contract between two services — typically a consumer (which makes requests) and a provider (which handles the requests). Unlike traditional integration tests, Pact allows the consumer to define the expected behavior of the provider. This consumer-driven approach ensures that both sides can evolve independently while still maintaining compatibility.
For a deeper dive into Pact testing and its benefits, explore this.
Why Use Pact Testing?
Pact testing is particularly effective for microservices architectures where services are deployed independently. It allows teams to ensure that changes to one service don’t break communication with others, even if they are developed by different teams or written in different programming languages.
How Pact Testing Works (The Pact Testing Process)
Let’s have a look at the process in steps:
- At its core, Pact testing works by creating a “contract” between the consumer and the provider.
- The consumer defines the expected interaction with the provider.
- The provider tests that it can fulfill the consumer’s expectations.
- This is done by generating a pact file, which acts as the contract, and using Pact’s tools to verify it.
Real Pact Testing Example in Practice
Let’s walk through a real Pact testing example, where we will test the interaction between a consumer and a provider. Suppose we have a simple e-commerce application where the consumer is a frontend web service, and the provider is a backend service that provides product details.
Step 1: Define the Contract
In this step, the consumer (frontend service) defines the expectations of how it will interact with the provider (backend service). For example, the consumer expects the provider to return a product’s details when a specific product ID is requested.
const pact = require(‘@pact-foundation/pact’);
const { like } = pact.Matchers;
const mockProvider = pact.MockService({ port: 3000 });
mockProvider.addInteraction({
state: ‘product exists’,
uponReceiving: ‘a request for product details’,
withRequest: {
method: ‘GET’,
path: ‘/products/1’,
},
willRespondWith: {
status: 200,
body: like({
id: 1,
name: ‘Product Name’,
price: 100.00,
}),
},
});
In this example, the consumer is requesting product details for product ID 1. The provider is expected to return a JSON object with the product’s id, name, and price. This is the contract the consumer expects from the provider.
Step 2: Provider Verifies the Contract
Once the contract is defined by the consumer, the provider must verify it. The provider tests the interaction by checking if it can fulfill the contract defined by the consumer.
describe(‘Provider verification’, () => {
it(‘should validate the interaction’, async () => {
const provider = new Pact({
consumer: ‘FrontendService’,
provider: ‘BackendService’,
port: 3000,
});
await provider.setup();
// Mock the provider’s behavior
provider.addInteraction({
state: ‘product exists’,
uponReceiving: ‘a request for product details’,
withRequest: {
method: ‘GET’,
path: ‘/products/1’,
},
willRespondWith: {
status: 200,
body: {
id: 1,
name: ‘Product Name’,
price: 100.00,
},
},
});
// Verify the interaction
await provider.verify();
await provider.finalize();
});
});
The provider verifies whether it can fulfill the consumer’s expectations as defined in the contract. If the provider’s response matches the contract, the test passes. If there are discrepancies, the test fails, and the provider will need to make adjustments.
Step 3: Pact File Creation and Sharing
Once the consumer and provider have completed their interactions, a pact file is generated. This file contains the details of the interactions between the consumer and provider. The pact file is shared via a Pact Broker, ensuring that both parties can access the contract and verify compatibility.
The Pact Broker acts as a repository for all generated pact files. Both the consumer and provider can reference the latest pact file to ensure they are always working with the most up-to-date contract.
Step 4: Continuous Integration (CI) and Automated Verification
To ensure that changes in either the consumer or provider don’t break the contract, Pact testing should be integrated into the CI pipeline. Whenever changes are made to the consumer or provider, the pact files are automatically verified to ensure compatibility.
Advantages of Real Pact Testing Examples
There are several advantages to using real-world Pact contract testing examples in practice:
Ensures Consistent Communication
By defining the expected behavior in the contract, Pact testing ensures that communication between services is predictable and consistent. Both the consumer and provider know exactly how the interaction should work, which reduces integration failures and ensures smooth communication.
Flexibility for Service Evolution
Pact testing allows the consumer and provider teams to work independently. Since the contract defines the interaction, the consumer and provider can evolve their services without disrupting the other team’s work. This is especially beneficial in large-scale systems where multiple teams are responsible for different services.
Early Detection of Breaking Changes
Pact testing helps catch breaking changes early. By running the tests during the development process and continuously verifying the pact files, teams can detect integration issues before they make it to production, preventing costly failures in production.
Improved Collaboration Between Teams
Pact testing fosters better communication and collaboration between teams. Both the consumer and provider work with the same contract, ensuring they are aligned and have a shared understanding of the expected behavior. This reduces miscommunication and promotes teamwork.
Conclusion
A real Pact contract testing example showcases how this framework can effectively validate the interactions between services. By allowing consumers to define expectations and providers to verify them, Pact testing ensures reliable communication, reduces integration issues, and improves collaboration between teams. Through continuous integration and automated verification, Pact contract testing helps maintain compatibility between evolving microservices and promotes smoother, more efficient software delivery.
Learn more about how Hypertest can help you integrate Pact contract testing into your workflow for seamless service communication and enhanced software reliability.
Ready to see Pact in action? To learn more about how Pact testing works in real-world scenarios, explore this.
 and a provider.){kind=link}