The Different Types of 3D File Formats

3D File Formats

3D file formats are digital benchmarks for saving, sharing, and understanding three-dimensional model information across software applications. These specialized file formats encompass essential geometric details, material characteristics, and scene attributes that outline virtual entities in three-dimensional space. The digital visualization landscape includes five main formats: 3D, STL, OBJ, FBX, and glTF. Each format caters to specific professional needs within the 3D workflow pipeline. 

3D file formats are digital benchmarks for saving and sharing model information 

3DS

The 3DS format was developed by Autodesk 3D Studio as a binary file system for saving three-dimensional information. This traditional format structures information into nested “chunks, ” distinguishing data segments with identifiers and length indicators that act like digital containers within other containers. The hierarchical structure is similar to contemporary data trees, offering storage for fundamental geometric meshes, material settings, lighting specifications, and camera locations within CAD applications and architectural visualization tools

Advantages:

  • Compact storage through binary encoding reduces file sizes (typically 30-50% smaller than text-based formats)
  • Built-in support for essential elements: geometry, textures, materials, and scene setup
  • Widespread compatibility with legacy design applications

Limitations:

  • Lacks support for contemporary features like physically-based rendering or complex animation rigging
  • Restricts file name length to 8+3 DOS format (12 characters maximum)
  • Incompatible with modern AR/VR development pipelines that require higher mesh density

The 3DS format was developed by Autodesk 3D Studio

STL

STL (Stereolithography) files serve as the standard in the industry for 3D printing, depicting object surfaces solely via triangular facets. Resolution directly impacts print quality – models featuring fewer triangles (low resolution) exhibit noticeable facets and sharp edges. In contrast, more triangles result in smoother surfaces but increase file sizes. The format is available in two forms: ASCII (text-oriented and easily readable by humans) and binary (efficient and optimized for machines), with binary versions often requiring 5-10 times less storage space for the same models

Advantages:

  • Universal compatibility with virtually all 3D printers and manufacturing software
  • Straightforward geometric structure simplifies model preparation for fabrication
  • Reliable performance across different hardware platforms and slicing engines

Limitations:

  • Stores no color, texture, or material specifications—only pure geometry
  • Lacks support for scene information, cameras, lights, or animation data
  • Creates inefficient file sizes for complex models (a detailed architectural model might require 100MB+ at print-ready resolution)

STL (Stereolithography) files serve as the standard 

OBJ

The OBJ format is an open standard for depicting 3D geometry via human-readable text files containing vertex coordinates, face definitions, texture mapping coordinates, and surface normals. OBJ files remain favored by design professionals due to their simple structure and the supplementary MTL files that outline surface characteristics for rendering. Interior designers often choose OBJ to share decoration 3D model since it maintains textures and is editable in regular text editors, featuring straightforward vertex definitions.

Key Capabilities:

  • Human-readable ASCII format allows direct inspection and modification without specialized software
  • Supports comprehensive material definition through MTL files, including diffuse color, specularity, and texture mapping
  • Functions as a universal exchange format across major 3D design applications in the architectural visualization industry

While STL excels in 3D printing applications with its streamlined geometric representation, OBJ delivers superior visualization capabilities for interior design projects where material properties and surface appearances determine client approval:

FeatureSTLOBJ
Geometry onlyYesYes
Color/TextureNoYes (via MTL)
AnimationNoNo
EditabilityDifficultEasy (text editor)
File SizeCompact for simple modelsLarger with texture data

The OBJ format is an open standard for depicting 3D geometry

FBX

FBX (Filmbox) is Autodesk’s exclusive exchange format intended to transfer digital assets throughout professional visualization processes. This durable format retains geometry, materials, texture maps, animations, skeletal rigging, and lighting settings all in one file. Design experts depend on FBX to transfer intricate 3D scenes between architectural visualization tools and real-time engines such as Unity. This ensures that scene hierarchies stay preserved during the exchange, allowing a completely animated interior tour to keep camera paths, light levels, and material characteristics consistent across platforms.

Key Capabilities:

  • Preserves comprehensive scene data, including meshes, UV mapping, animation keyframes, and hierarchical relationships
  • Maintains skeletal structures and animation sequences essential for character movement in architectural presentations
  • Supports industry-standard pipelines in film production, game development, and architectural visualization
  • Functions as the primary exchange format for VR/AR content creation workflows

FBX (Filmbox) is Autodesk’s exclusive exchange format 

glTF

The glTF format is the Khronos Group’s tailored answer for delivering web-optimized 3D content, frequently referred to as the “JPEG of 3D” within professional visualization communities. This format features a two-part structure: JSON files (.gltf) hold scene descriptions, material attributes, and animation data, whereas binary files (.glb) include compressed meshes and texture details. 

Key Capabilities:

  • Optimized transmission speeds reduce web page load times by 60-70% compared to conventional 3D formats.
  • Built-in support for physically-based rendering materials creates a consistent visual appearance across platforms.
  • JSON-based structure allows direct JavaScript manipulation without specialized parsing libraries.
  • Binary compression reduces typical model sizes by 30-40% without visual quality loss

The glTF format is the Khronos Group’s tailored answer

Conclusion

Choosing the right format is crucial for the success of projects in professional 3D visualization processes. Expert designers must assess project needs regarding format capabilities, considering aspects such as the end-use application, necessary features, and software compatibility throughout their production workflow. The specific requirements of your workflow ultimately determine the best format selection for achieving enhanced visualization outcomes.

Subscribe

* indicates required