The Shift to Agentic AI
Companies entered the generative AI (GenAI) era with enormous enthusiasm. Early projects focused on text generation, content summarization and conversational assistance and these capabilities delivered novelty and speed, but they stopped short of transforming how work actually gets done. Over the last year a significant shift has taken place. Organizations are beginning to explore agentic AI, which refers to systems that can interpret information, choose a logical next step and initiate actions within defined boundaries. This change signals a new phase in enterprise maturity. Leaders are no longer satisfied with tools that simply produce language. They are looking for AI that can participate meaningfully in the workflow for true enterprise productivity.
Table of contents
Where Early Projects Struggle
Recent findings from the Wharton Human AI Initiative and GBK Collective illustrate the early traction. Their 2025 AI adoption report noted that nearly one quarter of surveyed organizations had scaled at least one agentic AI capability.
This is still a minority, but it is a meaningful indicator. Enterprise leaders are moving beyond experimentation as they search for systems that can influence operational outcomes. Yet the report also revealed that many agentic projects stall before reaching production. Success requires more than a model with strong reasoning. It depends on the quality of the surrounding data, the clarity of the workflow and the organization’s willingness to redesign how decisions move from one point to another.
The attraction of agentic AI is easy to understand. Generative systems produce content, but they rely entirely on the user to provide direction. Agentic systems evaluate what they receive and take steps that align with the rules and objectives defined by the enterprise. For example, a system for enterprise productivity may review a customer inquiry, identify required documentation, retrieve relevant records, draft a response and queue the message for approval. The value does not come from language creation alone. It comes from the orchestration of actions that would otherwise require multiple employees and systems.
The distinction is important because many early AI implementations delivered uneven results. Pilots often centered on chatbots that could answer questions but lacked the ability to interact with core systems. This type of application created the illusion of progress without reducing the underlying workload. Users quickly learned that the bot could only handle straightforward requests. Anything beyond that required human intervention, which limited efficiency gains. This pattern created skepticism inside many organizations. Leaders began to realize that real impact requires AI that can participate in the chain of work rather than sitting outside it.
Requirements for Responsible Deployment
Agentic AI introduces this possibility, but it creates new demands for enterprise productivity. The first is precision. Enterprise environments contain strict rules about how data is handled, how tasks are approved and how exceptions are managed. Any system that acts within the workflow must understand these rules with clarity. This is why high-quality data and well-structured knowledge sources become essential. If the system cannot determine which version of a policy is current or which source is authoritative, it may take an action that needs to be reversed. The technology may be capable of reasoning, but it still depends on the signals the organization provides.
Another demand concerns accountability. As soon as an AI system takes action, executives must be able to explain how decisions are made. Regulators are increasing their expectations around transparency. The European Union AI Act, adopted in 2024, specifically requires traceability and clear governance for high-risk AI deployments.
Even organizations outside Europe feel the influence because global customers and partners expect similar accountability. An agentic system that interacts with financial records, customer information or regulatory materials must offer a way to verify what knowledge informed its steps. This level of transparency does not come automatically. It requires the enterprise to invest in governance practices that define what the system may access and how the output is validated.
Enterprise Productivity and Workflow Readiness
The third requirement is workflow readiness. Many companies underestimate how much redesign is needed to support AI driven actions. Workflows evolve over years, and much of the logic lives inside the habits of employees rather than documented processes. When AI enters these spaces, it exposes gaps that were previously manageable for teams but impossible for systems. For example, an employee may know that a particular approval is needed only during peak seasons or only for certain customer segments. Unless these nuances are recorded, the AI has no way to recognize them. This is one of the reasons early agentic AI pilots can struggle. The system highlights the absence of explicit structure, which forces organizations to articulate their rules in a more formal manner.
Some executives interpret this as a sign that the technology is not ready. In most cases the opposite is true. The technology reveals underlying operational inconsistencies that previously hid behind institutional knowledge. Addressing these gaps produces benefits beyond AI adoption. It creates a clearer operating model and ensures that critical decisions do not depend on undocumented experience.
There is also a human factor that plays an important role. Agentic AI changes responsibilities in ways that can create uncertainty for employees. If a system can carry out steps that previously required several people, teams may worry about the stability of their roles. Research from the 2025 Wharton report found that nearly half of workers felt unclear about how AI would influence their day-to-day responsibilities.
This uncertainty can slow adoption because employees may avoid relying on a tool they believe threatens their position. Leaders must address this through communication and training. When employees understand that the system handles routine tasks so they can focus on higher value work, resistance declines. This cultural shift is essential for scaling agentic AI because the technology cannot operate effectively without human oversight and strategic direction.
Preparing the Enterprise for What Comes Next
Looking ahead, the organizations that succeed with agentic AI will be the ones that view it as a capability rather than a feature. Capability means integration into workflows, alignment with business outcomes and connection to core knowledge sources. It also means accountability at every stage, from data governance to employee enablement. Leaders must move away from the idea that AI can be plugged into an existing process without deeper change. The real advantage comes when the enterprise redesigns how workflows so that AI and people collaborate more effectively.
The enterprise landscape is entering a new phase where systems that can interpret information and take action will define competitive advantage. Agentic AI presents an opportunity to shift from isolated experimentation to measurable operational impact for enterprise productivity. It requires clarity about data, structure and governance, but the organizations that meet these demands will position themselves ahead of the market. The next stage of AI leadership will belong to companies that treat intelligent action as a strategic priority rather than an optional enhancement.
